Following our Introduction to Taxonomy DNA, we would like here to showcase the sensitivity of our AI-operated taxonomy.
Comparing a specialist, Techcrunch, and a generalist, the New York Times – Technology.
Taxonomy DNA views: Both 12/18/18, 3% threshold, 7 day rolling learning (a post on this later on).
The New York Times – Technology
Top 10 categories
Interesting to watch the 4 first categories been the same with more on people for the NYT and more on Industries for Techcrunch., then NYT has Law, Politics, when Techcrunch has Finance and Hardware.
Finally, AI was pretty precise to classify Lifestyle and Digital Life for the NYT and Digital Tech for Techcrunch.
Why it matters.
TrustedOut Corpus Intelligence permits our users to create and maintain corpuses, precisely shaping out their definition of their trust for their analytics. With the example above, shall a study be on Tech AND Law, the NY Times – Technology section would be selected and not Techcrunch.
Like for any survey, the sample onto which the survey will be based on, makes or breaks the trustworthiness and the serious of its outcomes.
Trusted in, Trusted out.
Below is an example of the Corpus creation UI in TrustedOut.
The screenshot above comes from the “Country comparisons” Business Case.